Search Results for "seed processing"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Sets Aside High Court Judgment in Punjab Sales Tax Case Over Deduction on Cotton Seed Sales. Cotton Seeds Obtained After Ginning Held Not Same as Unginned Cotton for Purchase Turnover Deduction Under Section 5(2)(a)(vi) of Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948.

The Supreme Court considered whether a dealer was entitled under the Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948 to deduct from his purchase turnover the sale price of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in Maize Import License Dispute — Actual User Condition Not Violated. Petitioner Trading House Allowed to Import Maize Through Canalizing Agency Without Being Actual User Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a trading house incorporated in 1919 and engaged in export of rice, oil seed, food grains and puls...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Market Fees on Vanaspati as Edible Oil Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Held to Fall Within 'Edible Oils' Entry Added by 1987 Notification; Levy of Fees and Supervision Charges Upheld.

Two writ petitions were filed by companies manufacturing Vanaspati, challenging the levy of market fees and supervision charges by the Mumbai Agricult...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax-Free Status of Bagasse as Agricultural Produce Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Sale of Bagasse, a Residue of Sugarcane, is Exempt from Tax Under Section 5 and Schedule Entry A-44 of the BST Act, 1959.

The case involves two Sales Tax References (No. 6 of 2009 and No. 68 of 2009) filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, against M/s. ...