Search Results for "section 4(1) notification"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions in Land Acquisition Act Cases — Remands for Fresh Determination of Market Value as on Section 4(1) Notification Date.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Wangaon, Taluka Soygaon, District Aurangabad, filed writ petitions challenging the compensation awarde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld as Valid and for Public Purpose.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by shop owners and residents of Byadagi town, Haveri district, challenging the land acquisition proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate to Rs. 30,000 Per Acre with Statutory Benefits. Court Relies on Sale Deed of Similar Land and Previous Awards to Determine Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 26/08/2003 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Housing Board Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Delay in Publication and Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.202 measuring 18 acres, challenged the acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnataka a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Malaprabha Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' challenge to Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) notifications under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dismissed as they failed to explain delay of over 4 years.

The petitioners, 26 individuals from Gonnagar Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belgaum District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Corrigendum for Non-Existent Road — Adding New Purpose Without Fresh Notification Invalid Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Officer's Report Under Section 5A Recommending Dropping Acquisition Binding on Government.

The petitioners, Silvestre D' Souza and his wife Apolita D' Souza, purchased parts of a property in Santa Cruz, Goa, including a dwelling house. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Railway Project. Publication in Official Gazette and Local Newspapers Held Sufficient Compliance Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, 70 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of their lands for t...