Search Results for "section 29-a extension"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time for Arbitration in Infrastructure Dispute Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Grants Six Months Extension for Completion of Pending Arbitration Proceedings with Consent of Both Parties.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.08.2025 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...