Search Results for "section 21"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 21"

29 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Sugar Cane Reservation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Government Notification. Court holds that notification under Section 21 of the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 must be based on actual production capacity and not on installed capacity.

21 Nov 2025

The case involves a dispute over the reservation of cane supply area under the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961. The...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commercial Court Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator — Holds That Section 11(6) Application Under Arbitration Act Is Not Maintainable Before Commercial Court Without Prior Notice Under Section 21.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the Commercial Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Doctor for Failure to Report Sexual Abuse — Section 21 POCSO Act Requires Actual Knowledge of Offence, Not Mere Suspicion. Doctor Treating Minor for Pregnancy Without Knowledge of Sexual Assault Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 21 of POCSO Act.

2 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekar T.B., a doctor and accused No. 8 in Special Case No. 44/2023, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 21 of NIA Act as Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Order. The court held that an order on an interlocutory application under Section 20 of the NIA Act is not a final judgment and thus not appealable under Section 21 of the Act.

29 Mar 2022

The case involves a criminal appeal filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act) by four appellants, Irfan Pasha, W...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Private Security Agency for Lack of Sanction Under Section 20 of Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005. Court held that prosecution under Section 20 requires prior sanction of the controlling authority as per Section 21 of the Act, and in absence thereof, FIR is liable to be quashed.

18 Feb 2021

The petitioner, M/s. G.C.D Motors and M/s. Mangesh Motors, filed two petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Custody Order in Domestic Violence Case — Child's Welfare Paramount Under Section 21 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that interim custody orders must be based on evidence of child's best interests, not merely allegations of domestic violence.

21 Dec 2016

The petitioners, Dr. Parijat Vinod Kanetkar (husband), his mother, father, and sister, challenged the order dated 8.10.2015 passed by the Judicial Mag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Limitation — Contractor's Claims Not Barred by Limitation. Part Payments and Negotiations Constitute Acknowledgment of Debt Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, Extending Limitation Period.

8 Mar 2016

The dispute arose out of a renovation contract between Mahavir Prasad Jangid (appellant/contractor) and ECGC Limited (respondent). The appellant compl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes LIC's Rejection of Tenant's Regularisation Application — LIC Cannot Deny Regularisation to Tenant's Relative in Occupation Since 1967 on Grounds of Unauthorised Subletting Without Proper Inquiry. The Court Held That Family Occupation Does Not Constitute Subletting and That LIC Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice Before Rejecting Such Applications.

27 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Navroz Kershasp Mody, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 8 December 2012 issued by the Regional Manager (Estate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order Requiring Pre-Deposit Under Section 21 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Waiver of Deposit Not Justified as Petitioner Failed to Establish Irreparable Hardship.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Continental Construction Limited, was a defendant in a recovery suit filed by the Export Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) in the Debt ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Section 21 Mandates Deposit of 75% of Debt Amount Before Entertaining Appeal. The Court declined to interfere with the Appellate Tribunal's order directing 50% deposit, as the order was within the Tribunal's discretion and the petitioners had an alternative remedy.

12 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Ashish Mines & Minerals and others, were borrowers who had availed credit facilities from the Central Bank of India in 1985, includin...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)