Search Results for "section 143(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 143(3)"

59 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. as Charge Sheet Not Filed Within Statutory Period.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 03.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 01.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is an indefeasible right that accrues when the investigation is not completed within the prescribed period, and the accused is entitled to be released on bail if the charge sheet is not filed within that period.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali S/o Babajan Challal, was arrested in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals by Cooperative Society Against Rejection of Plaints in Suits for Permanent Injunction — Dispute Over Title to Property Requires Full Trial, Not Summary Rejection Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

22 Sep 2023

The appellant, Dattaprasad Cooperative Society Ltd., filed four Regular First Appeals against the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2006 passed by the V...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Extension Orders and Grants Default Bail to Accused in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case Due to Procedural Violation. The Court held that production of accused before the Special Court when considering Public Prosecutor's report for extension of investigation period under Section 20(2) of the 2015 Act is mandatory, and non-compliance renders extension orders illegal, entitling accused to default bail under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

23 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by accused persons charged under the Gujarat Control of T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Quashing Lokayukta Investigation Against Employee on Deputation. Lokayukta Lacks Jurisdiction Over Local Authority Employees Without Notification Under Section 2(12) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

21 Jun 2022

The State of Karnataka and its Principal Secretary filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.

30 Oct 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Bounce Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to aver that directors were in charge of and responsible for conduct of business at the time of offence.

23 Sep 2019

The applicants, Kulwant Chauhan and Upneet Chauhan, were directors of a company that issued cheques to Transasia BioMedicals Ltd. The cheques were dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Inventory Proceedings Dispute — Clarifies Appointment of Cabeca-de-casal and Maintainability of Common Inventory for Spouses with Different Heirs. The court held that the lower courts had erred in their orders regarding the appointment of Cabeca-de-casal and the maintainability of a common inventory proceeding under the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867, as applicable in Goa.

24 Nov 2017

The case involves a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 13.10.2015 passed by the l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Application Against Quashing of Process in NI Act Case — Company Can Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Despite Being Incorporated Under Companies Act. The revisional court's reliance on Natural Sugar case was misplaced as the Supreme Court in Standard Chartered Bank and Iridium India Telecom Ltd. held that a company is liable for criminal prosecution.

16 Jul 2015

The applicant, M/s Wairagade Engineering Corporation, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against M/s...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)