Search Results for "sample tampering"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Citing Parity and Long Incarceration. Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required Under Section 439 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to bail applications filed by three applicants — Aditya Avinash Sood, Arunkumar Devnath Singh, and Vishal SurendraKumar Agarwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revision Filed in High Court.

The revision application was filed by the applicants, who were original accused nos.3 and 4, challenging the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Life Protection Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Conviction for Possession of Leopard Skin Under Section 9 Read with Section 51 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Set Aside as Evidence of Seizure and Recovery Was Unreliable.

The case involves three revision applications filed by Vinod Diwakar Sontakke, Kuldip Madhukar Chaudhari, and Shridhar Kawadu Yerawar against their co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Tampering or Unauthorized Use Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Girish Shankarlal Ostawal and Dilip Shankarlal Ostawal by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18A Notice Procedure. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Explain Before Filing Complaint Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd and others, filed writ petitions challenging the order dated 24 September 2014 passed by the Chief Judic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Turf Club Dispute Over Horse Race Doping Allegations — Interim Injunction Set Aside. Court holds that internal disciplinary proceedings of a club are not subject to judicial review unless they violate principles of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The case involves a dispute arising from horse racing at the Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. (RWITC). The plaintiff, Vinayak J. Gaekwad, owned a ho...