Search Results for "sale and lease back"

557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...