Search Results for "retrospective revision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "retrospective revision"

239 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 239 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

15 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 — Time Limit for Obtaining Environmental Clearance Upheld. Rule 8-B requiring quarry lease holders to obtain environmental clearance within 24 months from commencement of amendment rules is held to be reasonable and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, holders of quarry leases for minor minerals, challenged the validity of Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Pay Revision for Unaided Private Engineering College. Government Resolutions directing retrospective implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission recommendations held not binding on unaided private institutions, but prospective implementation required.

7 Sep 2018

The petitioners, D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and its managing trust D.Y. Patil Pratisthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Dismissal of Employee. Retrospective Dismissal from Service Held Illegal as It Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Managing Director of Parner Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 28.02.1995 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act Despite Retrospective Amendment After Assessment Order. Commissioner Must Consider Retrospective Amendment as Law Deemed to Exist on Date of Assessment Order.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Kalpesh M. Nagda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 on 25 November 2003, declaring total income of Rs.48,22,312...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Charges in Distillery License — Levy Upheld as Contractual Obligation Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

10 Jul 2012

The petitioners, Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Negotiable Instruments Act Case - Holds Amended Provisions Apply Retrospectively to Pending Complaints. The court ruled that procedural amendments under the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 apply to all pending complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, regardless of the date of filing.

21 Sep 2005

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by M/s. Indraprastha Holdings Ltd., the complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Ne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Strike Out Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. Court held that disputed questions of title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC and require full trial.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from two civil revision applications filed against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 30th April 2014, which dismisse...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)