Search Results for "retrospective pay revision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "retrospective pay revision"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Pay Revision for Unaided Private Engineering College. Government Resolutions directing retrospective implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission recommendations held not binding on unaided private institutions, but prospective implementation required.

7 Sep 2018

The petitioners, D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and its managing trust D.Y. Patil Pratisthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teachers Seeking Pension Revision Based on 6th Pay Commission. Held that Hakim Committee Recommendations Not Applicable to Teaching Staff and Pre-2006 Retirees Not Entitled to Revised Pension.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, an association of superannuated teachers, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the recommendations of the Hakim committee ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

8 Jan 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act Despite Retrospective Amendment After Assessment Order. Commissioner Must Consider Retrospective Amendment as Law Deemed to Exist on Date of Assessment Order.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Kalpesh M. Nagda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 on 25 November 2003, declaring total income of Rs.48,22,312...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Charges in Distillery License — Levy Upheld as Contractual Obligation Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

10 Jul 2012

The petitioners, Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Grant Revised Pay Scales to High Court Section Officers on Par with Mantralaya Staff — Parity Principle Upheld. The Court held that the long-standing principle of pay parity between High Court staff and Mantralaya staff must be maintained, and directed the State to apply the revised pay scales from the date of the Government Resolution dated 11 February 2013.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Pay Parity for Section Officers in High Court Administration with Mantralaya Staff. The court upheld the principle of parity of pay scales between High Court staff and State Government staff based on a 1965 agreement.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Dismissal of Employee. Retrospective Dismissal from Service Held Illegal as It Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Managing Director of Parner Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 28.02.1995 passed by the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)