Search Results for "refund order"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "refund order"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

23 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Judgment on Delay in Possession: Balancing Interests of Allottee and Developer "Supreme Court affirms NCDRC's order for refund with interest, recognizing delays from both parties; upholds jurisdiction and considers absence of completion certificate."

6 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) judgment concerning a housing dispute. The ...

Supreme Court

Consumer Disputes Commission Order Challenged: Court Increases Interest on Refund for Delayed Flat Possession. Appeal Results in Enhanced Interest Rate from 9% to 12% for Complainants Against Parsvnath Developers Limited

29 Jul 2024

This appeal challenges the order dated 29th September 2022, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, which directed t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Reduced Refund in Property Sale Dispute. Plaintiff's Claim of Additional Rs. 15,00,000/- Unproven, Refund Limited to Rs. 3,00,000/- with Interest

8 Jul 2024

This appeal challenges the judgment of the High Court of Kerala, which modified the Trial Court's decree in a suit for specific performance. The High ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contempt Case Over Refund of Excess Coal Price and Interest Rate Dispute. The court held that respondents must comply with High Court orders for refund and pay interest at 12% per annum as per Supreme Court precedent, not bank rate, under principles of contempt and restitution.

22 Feb 2024

The dispute originated from the appellant paying a higher price than the notified price in an e-auction for coal conducted by the respondent. After li...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Housing Project. Developer's liability to refund allottees upheld due to breach of construction timeline under Tripartite Agreement, with consumer fora jurisdiction affirmed despite arbitration clause.

13 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a housing project named 'Pride Asia' in Chandigarh, where the Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) was appointed as the nodal agency ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Recovery Case - Clarifies No Separate Section 11A Notice Required When Refund Order Reviewed Under Section 35E. Recovery of erroneous refund granted through speaking order reviewed under Section 35E of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not require separate show cause notice under Section 11A, as Sections 35E and 11A operate in different fields with different purposes and time limits.

24 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from the respondent company's manufacture of cotton yarn consumed captively in its composite mills for weaving fabric. Followin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.

21 Jan 2022

The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)