Search Results for "red-handed"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 394 IPC for Robbery During Marriage Party. Applicant Caught Red-Handed After Assaulting Victim and Taking Rs.300, Conviction Confirmed by Appellate Court.

The applicant, Matin Khan, was convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for robbery. The incident occurred during a marriage party w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquitted Accused in Bribery Case Due to Lack of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Established – Conviction and Sentence Set Aside – Prosecution’s Case Collapsed Due to Inconsistent Evidence �...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaysing Nayrana Bidgar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sitaram S/o. Baliram Fating, a retired Maintenance City Survey Officer, was convicted by the Special Court (A.C.B.), Nagpur, in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Kolhapur, acquitting the respondent Sikandar Khutubuddin Mujawar of charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Abates Appeals and Hears Remaining Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 365 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted 13 Accused for Abduction and Wrongful Confinement; No Final Disposition Available in Extracted Text.

The proceedings arose from FIR dated 13 November 1998 registered at Police Station Ashti, alleging that on 9 November 1998, the complainant Japan Raja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Rexine Bag Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohd. Anis Mohd Rafique Khan, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of one person and for causing disappearance of...