Search Results for "recovery from pension"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Withholding of Pension and Gratuity During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. State of Bihar's Circulars and Resolution Cannot Override Rule 43(b) of Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 Which Requires a Finding of Guilt Before Withholding Pension.

The appellant, Dr. Hira Lal, was a Touring Veterinary Officer in Bihar who was implicated in the Fodder Scam (RC Case No.48 A/1996) and placed under s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Bank Employee's Petition Against Unilateral Withholding of Pension. Pension is a property right and cannot be stopped without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings under Bank of Maharashtra Pension Regulations.

The petitioner, Devanand s/o Galomal Nichwani, was a computer operator/clerk at Bank of Maharashtra, Jaripatka Branch, Nagpur. He opted for voluntary ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Addition of Defence Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — Ex-Serviceman Entitled to Count Military Service Under Rule 3 of KPTCL Pension Regulations, 1999.

The petitioner, Sri R. Hanumatha Singh, an ex-serviceman who served in the Indian Air Force from 31.01.1972 to 08.05.1987, later joined the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute: Patna High Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction to Entertain Writ Petition Challenging Stoppage of Pension. Part of Cause of Action Arose Where Pension Was Received and Stopped, Not Where Employment Was Served.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Patna High Court dismissing a Letters Patent Appeal against a Single Judge's order that had dismissed a writ p...