Search Results for "reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "reconstruction"

717 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 717 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Repairs/Reconstruction Contracts Covered Under 'Construction Contracts' for Tax Rate Purposes. The Court held that the term 'construction contracts' in Section 42(3) of the MVAT Act read with Notification dated 30 November 2006 includes repairs/reconstruction of buildings, and the rate of tax is 5%.

25 Jul 2017

The appellant, Painterior (India), a registered partnership firm under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), is engaged in the busines...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - STP Undertaking Exemption Denied as Manufacturing Commenced Before 1 April 1994. The court held that the conditions of Section 10A(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not fulfilled because the undertaking had already started manufacturing before the cutoff date, and the subsequent slump sale did not affect the commencement date.

6 Mar 2012

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing the assessee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court in SICA Case on Unsecured Creditor Rights - Sanctioned Rehabilitation Scheme Binding on All Creditors. Court held that under Sections 18(8) and 32 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, unsecured creditors cannot opt out of scaled-down payments and must accept scheme terms for company revival.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals concerning the binding effect of rehabilitation schemes sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

22 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)