Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1368 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1368 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Proof of Income. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of 50% contributory negligence but reduced the notional income and set aside future prospects, resulting in a reduced award of Rs. 13,76,000/-.

5 Feb 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, a 55-year-old vegetable vendor, who died in a...

High Court

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

10 Jan 2025

The case arises from a road accident on 30.10.2016 at about 2.15 p.m. on Mohanur to Karur Road near Vangal Bridge. The defacto complainant Jagadeeswar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Minor in Motor Accident, Applies Multiplier of 18 and Grants Rs. 1,00,000 for Loss of Estate and Funeral Expenses. The court held that the finding of contributory negligence against the deceased minor was not justified and the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation with recovery rights.

9 Dec 2024

The case involves three appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition. The accident occurred on 09.06.2015 when a car driven by Aboobakkar Sidd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

21 Oct 2024

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

26 Jun 2024

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

21 Dec 2023

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant as Driver-cum-Owner Not Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a claimant who is the driver-cum-owner of the offending vehicle cannot maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is intended for third parties and not for the owner/driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.

23 Jan 2023

The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 11.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Stays Gauhati High Court's Direction to Prosecute Motor Vehicle Offences Only Under MV Act — Issue of Prosecution Under IPC Left Open. The Court Held That the MV Act Is Primarily a Beneficial Legislation for Compensation and Chapter XIII Deals with Regulatory Offences, Not Barring IPC Prosecution.

4 Oct 2019

The case arose from a judgment of the Gauhati High Court, Agartala bench, dated 22.12.2008, which held that road traffic offences should be prosecuted...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

9 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Concurrent Findings of Misconduct Not Interfered With. Petitioner failed to maintain safe distance causing three deaths; Labour Court and Industrial Court concurrently upheld dismissal as proportionate punishment.

28 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Syed Mumtaz Syed Moosa, was employed as a driver with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (respondent) since 1984. On 9th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)