Search Results for "railway encroachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "railway encroachment"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupiers Against Railway Eviction — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Act cannot override the Public Premises Act in respect of Railway property, and petitioners cannot claim protected occupier status.

23 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions and several interlocutory applications filed by occupants of Railway land in Mumbai. The petitioners in Writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupants on Railway Land — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is inapplicable to railway property, and eviction is governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioners, occupants of railway land in Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that they are 'protected occupiers' under the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Railway Encroachment on Private Land Without Acquisition. Petitioner's land used for railway line without acquisition proceedings; court orders compensation under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Sumit S/o Ashokkumar Bharadiya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad alleging that the Railway Authorities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Encroachment and Title. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

4 Mar 2005

The case involves two cross suits between Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde (appellant) and Anna Bhau Lone (respondent) concerning a property admeasuri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court finds no substantial question of law as appellant failed to prove title and respondent established adverse possession.

4 Mar 2005

The case involves two cross suits between the appellant, Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde, and the respondent, Anna Bhau Lone, concerning a property a...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 1961 Land Acquisition as Barred by Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for restoration of land acquired over six decades ago fails due to unexplained delay and lack of locus standi.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Amratlal Ishwarlal Patel, aged about 84 years and a retired Central Government pensioner, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Railway Licence Plot Dispute — Courts Below Failed to Consider Admission Under Order VIII CPC. Refund of Rs.50,050 with 18% Interest Upheld as Railway's Admission of Receipt Not Denied.

21 Feb 2014

The original plaintiff, Bhika s/o Antu Kale, a retired Railway servant, filed Regular Civil Suit No.996 of 1987 against the Railways for possession an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Sakleshpur Town — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition for widening of B.M. Road was a routine development activity and the provisions of Sections 24 and 38 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 were not mandatory for such acquisitions.

14 Jan 2019

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 20 petitioners, who are owners of properties situated on B.M. Road in Sakleshpur town, Hassan Dis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court's Interpretation of Article 131: Federal Disputes and Legal Rights. A detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 131, focusing on federalism, state consent, and the role of the CBI within Indian constitutional law.

10 Jul 2024

The maintainability of a suit filed by the State of West Bengal against the Union of India under Article 131 of the Indian Constitution, challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Municipal Market and Housing. Claimant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation awarded by SLAO under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

2 Mar 2015

The case is a Land Acquisition Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimant, Pundalik Raghunath Mahulkar, seeki...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)