Search Results for "railway circular"

194 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of Retired Judicial Member of Railway Claims Tribunal — Notification Denying Pension Quashed as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional. Pension is a right under Article 300A and denial without authority of law is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioner, Prabhakar H. Parab, a retired Judicial Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...