Search Results for "promoter liability"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case — Force Majeure Clause Cannot Override Statutory Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act. Promoter Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Possession Even if Delay Due to Events Beyond Control.

The case involves an appeal filed by Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (the promoter/developer) under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Devel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Housing Society in Property Dispute Over Water Connection and Construction. Developer's Agreement to Provide Water Connection and Restrict Construction Held Binding.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 31st March 2004 in L.C. Suit No. 786 of 2004. The appellants in First App...