Search Results for "principal employer liability"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs District Collector to Execute Recovery Certificate in Favour of Workman Under Section 33(c)(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 21 of Contract Labour Act for Contractor's Failure to Pay Wages.

The petitioner, a workman employed by a contractor (Design Private Ltd.) at the Thermal Power Station of Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. (G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal Against Acquittal in Contribution Default Case. Principal Employer Status Established Under Section 2(17) of ESI Act Despite Lack of Documentary Proof.

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (appellant) filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of the respondents (M/s Universal Engineering ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against ESI Court Order Holding Lessor as Principal Employer for ESI Dues. Dispute Involves Whether Lessor Liable Under Section 93-A of Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948 for Dues of Lessee's Employees.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of an application by the Employee State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which upheld the recovery proceedings initiated b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Appellants, Setting Aside High Court Order Imposing Penalty Liability on Insurance Company Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 -- Employer Solely Liable for Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b) as Per Ved Prakash Garg Judgment

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Appellants, challenging the Delhi High Court's order that imposed liability for penalty under Section 4A(3)(b)...