Gujarat High Court Directs District Collector to Execute Recovery Certificate in Favour of Workman Under Section 33(c)(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 21 of Contract Labour Act for Contractor's Failure to Pay Wages.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a workman employed by a contractor (Design Private Ltd.) at the Thermal Power Station of Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. (GSECL), filed a Recovery Application under section 33(c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, being Recovery Application No.59/2021 in Reference (LCN) No.15/2014 before the Labour Court, Nadiad. The Labour Court allowed the application and directed the respondent management to pay Rs.2,99,624/- to the petitioner. As the order was not complied with, the petitioner filed another Recovery Application under section 33(c)(1) of the I.D. Act, being Recovery Application No.69/2023, which was allowed on 27.09.2024. The Labour Court then issued a Recovery Certificate dated 02.01.2025. Despite the certificate, the amount was not paid. The petitioner therefore filed the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 33(c)(1) of the I.D. Act, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector (respondent no.1) to execute the recovery certificate and deposit the amount before the Labour Court for disbursement to the petitioner. The petitioner also joined GSECL as respondent no.2, invoking section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970, which makes the principal employer liable if the contractor fails to pay wages. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the District Collector is bound to execute the recovery certificate as arrears of land revenue. The court directed the District Collector to execute the certificate within four weeks and deposit the amount before the Labour Court, which shall then disburse it to the petitioner by account payee cheque after proper verification. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33(c)(1) - Recovery of Money - Execution of Recovery Certificate - Labour Court issued recovery certificate for Rs.2,99,624/- in favour of workman - District Collector directed to execute the certificate as arrears of land revenue and deposit amount before Labour Court - Held that the District Collector is bound to execute the recovery certificate under section 33(c)(1) read with relevant rules (Paras 1-5).

B) Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 - Section 21 - Liability of Principal Employer - Workman employed by contractor in Thermal Power Station of Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. - Contractor failed to pay wages - Principal employer liable to pay wages under section 21 - Held that principal employer is responsible when contractor defaults (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the District Collector is obliged to execute a recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court under section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and whether the principal employer can be directed to deposit the amount when the contractor fails to pay wages.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The District Collector, respondent no.1, is directed to execute the Recovery Certificate dated 02.01.2025 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and deposit the amount before the Labour Court, Nadiad. The Labour Court shall disburse the amount to the petitioner by account payee cheque after proper verification. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Recovery of money due from employer under section 33(c)(1) of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Labour Court can issue recovery certificate
  • District Collector is bound to execute recovery certificate as arrears of land revenue
  • Principal employer liable under section 21 of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act
  • 1970 if contractor fails to pay wages
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:20597

R/Special Civil Application No. 14951 of 2025

2026-03-05

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:20597

Mr. U.T. Mishra for Petitioner, Ms. Sweety Samara (AGP) for Respondent No.1, Mr. Dipak R. Dave for Respondent No.2

Swaroopsinh Arjunsinh Parmar

The District Collector & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking execution of a recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector to execute the Recovery Certificate dated 02.01.2025 and deposit the amount before the Labour Court, Nadiad, for disbursement to the petitioner.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance of the Labour Court's order dated 27.09.2024 allowing Recovery Application No.69/2023 under section 33(c)(1) of the I.D. Act, and failure to pay the awarded amount of Rs.2,99,624/- despite issuance of Recovery Certificate.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court, Nadiad allowed Recovery Application No.59/2021 under section 33(c)(2) of I.D. Act directing payment of Rs.2,99,624/-; subsequently, Recovery Application No.69/2023 under section 33(c)(1) was allowed on 27.09.2024, and Recovery Certificate was issued on 02.01.2025.

Issues

Whether the District Collector is bound to execute the recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court under section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Whether the principal employer (Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd.) can be held liable under section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 for wages when the contractor fails to pay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Labour Court's order and recovery certificate were not complied with, and the District Collector is duty-bound to execute the certificate as arrears of land revenue. Respondents did not oppose the petition; learned counsels waived service and consented to final hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

Under section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court for money due from an employer is to be executed by the District Collector as if it were a decree for the recovery of arrears of land revenue. The District Collector is bound to execute such certificate without delay. Additionally, under section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970, the principal employer is liable to pay wages if the contractor fails to do so.

Judgment Excerpts

Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the provision of section 33(c)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking following reliefs: Brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that, the petitioner was working under the Contractor - Design Private Ltd. in the Thermal Power Station of Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. The Labour Court had issued Recovery Certificate dated 2-1-2025.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Recovery Application No.59/2021 under section 33(c)(2) of I.D. Act before Labour Court, Nadiad, which was allowed. Non-compliance led to filing of Recovery Application No.69/2023 under section 33(c)(1), allowed on 27.09.2024. Recovery Certificate issued on 02.01.2025. Since amount not paid, petitioner filed present writ petition on 14.03.2025 (as per case number). Heard on 05.03.2026 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 33(c)(1), 33(c)(2)
  • Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970: 21
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Personal Insolvency Application Under Section 95(1) IBC — Guarantors' Challenge Fails Due to Debt Acknowledgment and Lack of Objection Before NCLT. The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainabl...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs District Collector to Execute Recovery Certificate in Favour of Workman Under Section 33(c)(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 21 of Contract Labour Act for Contractor's Failur...