Search Results for "premature challenge"

345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines for Premature Release of Life Convict in Murder During Robbery Case. Petitioner's Offence of Murder During Robbery Correctly Categorized Under Category 5(a) of the 1992 Guidelines, Which Superseded the 1978 Guidelines.

The petitioner, Harjeetsingh Niranjansingh Jabbal, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for murder committed during a rob...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition for Premature Release in Murder Case — Co-accused's Release Not a Valid Ground for Parity. Petitioner's Sentence Period Including Remission Was Less Than 22 Years Required Under Clause 4(b) of Guidelines Dated 15th March, 2010.

The petitioner, Chintaman Sitaram Kedari, a life convict convicted under Sections 452, 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Army Major's Resignation in Writ Petition Under Article 226 — Rejection Set Aside as Arbitrary. Right to Resign Must Be Considered Reasonably with Disclosure of Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Major Yogesh Chandra Madhav Sayanakar and Ms. Shruti Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition on Premature Retirement and the Role of Adverse ACRs in Service Tenure. Court clarifies the role of Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and their impact on premature retirement under Rule 3.26(d) of Punjab Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, a Senior Assistant in the Cooperative Department, challenges his premature retirement under Rule 3.26(d) of the Punjab Civil Services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Misconduct by Advocates-on-Record and Senior Advocates; Calls for Reforms in Senior Advocate Designation Process

Court Emphasizes Ethical Standards, Accountability, and the Need for Robust Guidelines to Uphold Integrity in the Legal Profession The court recalle...