Search Results for "prejudicial activity"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Specificity in Grounds. Court emphasizes the need for clear and specific reasons for preventive detention to uphold constitutional safeguards.

The detention order of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA). The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...