Search Results for "pre-deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "pre-deposit"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Input Services Used in Exported Goods. Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of credit on input services used in manufacture of exported goods, and the definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) includes services used in relation to export.

9 Nov 2011

The judgment involves five appeals filed by four companies (M/s. Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shridhar Castings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shiva Steel Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in MSMED Act Arbitration Challenge — Pre-Deposit Must Include Interest. Section 19 of MSMED Act mandates 75% deposit of entire award amount, including compound interest, and Single Judge's order restricting deposit to principal was erroneous.

2 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal by M/s.Unicon Engineers, the respondent in an arbitration petition, against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in VAT/GST Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds That Proof of Payment Can Be Produced Before First Hearing. The Court ruled that the requirement to deposit 12.5% of the disputed tax under the second proviso of Section 19 of the APGST Act, 1957 does not mandate payment within the limitation period for filing the appeal, but only before the appeal is first taken up for consideration.

10 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Appellate Authority under the APGST Act, 1957, AP VAT Act, 2005, and ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

22 Aug 2019

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Appeal Filed.

19 Jun 2017

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Haresh Nagindas Vora and Sachin Laxmichand Shah, partners of M/s Bright International, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Hearing Opportunity Was Denied.

19 Jun 2017

The petitioners, partners of M/s Bright International, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging MSME Facilitation Council Reference and Award — Held That Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Does Not Require Prior Agreement for Reference and That Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to Setting Aside of Award.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Morarjee Textiles Ltd., its Head of Finance, and its Executive Director and Chairperson, challengi...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)