Search Results for "possession delay"

3685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff's Right to Possession Based on Prior Possession Against Trespasser in Property Dispute. Plaintiff's Failure to Prove Title Does Not Bar Ejectment Suit Against Wrongdoer When Prior Possession Established, Even If Not Filed Under Section 9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877.

This appeal arose from a suit for possession of a piece of land measuring 2856 sq. yards in Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. The plaintiff, Dr. S.P. Raju, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Possession and Damages. Defendant's Possession Not Protected Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Due to Breach of Contract and Non-Performance.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Deorao Balaji Bhoyar (since deceased, through legal representatives), against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Considers Second Appeal on Condonation of Delay in Mesne Profit Appeal. Limitation for Appeal Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Arises from Date of Decree Drawing, Not Judgment.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, was a tenant in the suit premises owned by the respondents. After a decree for possession wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...