Search Results for "pooled price"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL No. 331 of 2012

The dispute centered on the shareholding of Gharda Chemicals Ltd., a closely held company originally belonging to the Gharda and Kavasmaneck families....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Dream 11 for Alleged Gambling and GST Evasion. Fantasy Sports Held to be Game of Skill, Not Gambling Under Public Gambling Act, 1867.

The petitioner, a public-spirited advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to initiate criminal prosecution against Dream 11 Fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...