Search Results for "plot allotment"

449 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 449 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The plaintiffs' contentions, acceptance of smaller plots without protest, failure to provide evidence for damages, and the absence of guaranteed right to land allocation.

Legal dispute between the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and the plaintiffs concerning land allotment and compensation under Town Planning Scheme No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...