Search Results for "pleading requirements"

784 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 784 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Claiming Easementary Rights Over 20ft Wide Road — Pleadings Must Specifically Allege 20-Year User for Prescription Under Section 15 of Indian Easements Act, 1882. Easement of Necessity Requires Proof of Absolute Necessity and Common Origin, Which Was Not Established.

The dispute pertains to easementary rights over a 20ft wide road situated on land Survey No.57 Hissa No.13A/1 owned by the respondents (Ramani's). The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Preliminary Objections in Election Petition Alleging Corrupt Practices under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Objections Pertain to Non-compliance with Sections 81, 83, and 86 Regarding Material Facts, Affidavit, and True Copy of Petition.

In this election petition before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the petitioner challenged the election of the respondent from the Gondia c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 81(3) and Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Petition Lacked Material Facts and Proper Verification.

The petitioner, Sambhaji Laxmanrao Pawar, filed an election petition under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit for Want of Proof of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff Failed to Aver and Prove Continuous Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mehboob-ur-Rehman (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendant to File Properly Verified Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Order VI Rule 15-A CPC Compliance Essential for Leading Evidence. Defect in Verification is Curable; Defendant Permitted to Cure Defect Subject to Costs of Rs. 5,000.

The petitioner, Mr. N. Babu Reddy, was the defendant in Commercial O.S. No. 104/2022 before the XI Additional District Judge (Dedicated Commercial Cou...