Search Results for "plausible interpretation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "plausible interpretation"

316 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application — Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute over export credit insurance claim repudiation. The court held that at the stage of Section 11, only the existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined, not the merits or limitation.

15 Oct 2025

The petitioner, ECGC Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with an interim appl...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Transferable Duty Free Licence. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of claim for damages based on alleged breach of warranty regarding transferability of advance licence.

10 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Claim Dispute. Claim for demurrage and detention charges held time-barred under Article 55 of Limitation Act, 1963 as the cause of action arose on completion of discharge, not on subsequent demand.

8 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, National Iranian Tanker Company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majorit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over 'Change in Law' Clause — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Interpretation of contractual clause by Arbitral Tribunal was plausible and not perverse, hence not liable to be set aside under Section 34.

11 May 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (SEAMEC Ltd.) against the judgment of the Gauh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Tender Dispute, Restoring Authority's Decision on Technical Disqualification. The Court held that judicial review of tender decisions is limited to examining arbitrariness, and the tender inviting authority's interpretation of 'same or similar category products' was not perverse or irrational, thus upholding the rejection of the bid based on past performance criteria.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a Notice Inviting Tender issued by Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti for the supply of tablets for school children. The tender inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator Directed. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Carol Info Services Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)