Search Results for "physical dispossession"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Trial Court Decree in Possession Dispute Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Finding of Possession and Dispossession Held Perverse Due to Contradictory Evidence and Absence of Proof.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff's Prior Possession Established Despite Temporary Absence. Possession Through Tenant is Sufficient for Summary Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arises out of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, concerning Plot No. 8 in the layout of Uruvila Cooperative Housing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Held Validly Taken Despite Existence of Structures. Panchnama and Rapat Sufficient to Constitute Taking of Possession Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Haryana appealed against the High Court's judgment that declared the acquisition of the respondent's land as lapsed under Section 24(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Ownership Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title by Adverse Possession Against State Forest Department. Continuous possession for over 50 years not sufficient to establish ownership without clear evidence of hostile possession and ouster of true owner.

The appellant, Tanaji Gulabgir Gosavi, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.

The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...