Search Results for "phodi"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Revenue Authorities to Process Phodi Applications Without NOC from KIADB for Land Granted in 1939-40. The court held that KIADB has no jurisdiction over grants made prior to its establishment, and thus authorities cannot insist on NOC from KIADB for phodi.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of 5 acres of land in Sy.No.1 of M.Satyawara Village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representations for Survey and Phodi of Darkasth Granted Land — Delay in Administrative Action. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Respondents to Dispose of Pending Representations Within Three Months.

The petitioner, Smt. Prema Venkatesh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition Among Muslim Heirs. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Petitioners Entitled to Joint Possession as Co-Sharers Under Muslim Personal Law.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Syed Mohiuddin Ali @ Modin Ali, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry made in the revenue rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Cancelling Caste Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Karnataka SC/ST Act.

The petitioner, Basavarajappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition for Lack of Standing as Non-Party. Order XLIII Rules 1 & 2 CPC bar review by a person who was not a party to the original writ petition.

The review petitioner, Sri. Venkateshwara Rao, filed a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC seeking review of a judgment dated 23.04.2019 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...