Search Results for "per passenger fee"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Indonesian National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Search Procedures. Conviction for possession of 3.930 kg Methamphetamine set aside as prosecution failed to follow Section 52-A NDPS Act sampling requirements and Section 50 search safeguards.

The appellant, an Indonesian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for possession of 3.930 kg of Methamphetamine and sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...