Search Results for "patta change"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Appeal Suit Challenging Partition Decree. Trial Court Ordered Partition of Suit Properties into 25 Equal Shares with 19/25 Share to Plaintiffs.

The appeal arises from the decree of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu, in O.S.No.243 of 2005, whereby the trial court ordered partition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Admitted Second Appeal Against First Appellate Decree Rejecting Plaintiffs' Ancestral Title Based on Revenue Records. Substantial Questions Involved Presumption of Official Acts Under Section 114 Evidence Act and Need for Proving Admitted Genealogy.

This second appeal arises from a suit for declaration and recovery of possession of property claimed by the appellants (plaintiffs). The plaintiffs co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of Pattas for Public Utility Land. Land Recorded as Khalihan and Pasture Land Under Section 132 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 Cannot Be Granted Bhumidhari Rights.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning land in District Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh, originally recorded as Category-6 (barren/uncultivated land includi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Restoring DRO's Cancellation of Patta in Favour of WSIL. Land Acquisition by State Vests Title Absolutely, DRO Cannot Adjudicate Title in Summary Proceedings.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court that had restored an order of the District Revenue Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...