Search Results for "party not impleaded"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "party not impleaded"

1354 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1354 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit -- Trial Court's Discretion Under CPC Upheld Despite 20-Year Delay in Filing

9 Jan 2026

The petitioner challenged the Trial Court's order rejecting her application to implead family members as defendants in a partition suit pending since ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Prevent Proforma Defendants from Leading Evidence in Eviction Suit — Interest Not Adverse Does Not Bar Evidence. The court held that the right to lead evidence is not dependent on the nature of interest but on the court's discretion and the necessity for just adjudication under the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882.

10 May 2024

The petition challenges an order of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai rejecting the plaintiffs' application to prevent certain defendants (Defendant No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Appointments of Relatives of Selection Committee Members in Shiksha Karmi Grade-III Recruitment Due to Bias and Nepotism. The selection of close relatives by the selection committee members was held to be in violation of Section 40(C) and Section 100 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993, and the appointments were rightly cancelled despite the appointees not being heard.

16 Apr 2024

The case pertains to the selection and appointment of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III in Janpad Panchayat Gaurihar, District Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, in 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Complainant's Husband Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. The court held that the husband of the complainant cannot be prosecuted for dishonour of cheques issued by the wife in discharge of her own liability, as there is no vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Oct 2017

The applicant, A.C. Narayanan, was impleaded as an accused in complaints filed by respondent no.2 for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Neg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

Tribunals

NCLAT Sets Aside Impleadment Order in CIRP Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice — Corporate Debtor's Director Cannot Be Impleaded Without Notice Under Section 60(5) IBC. The order of impleadment was passed without prior notice to the Appellant, violating principles of natural justice, and was set aside with a remand for fresh consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai Bench, heard an appeal filed by Inkel Limited, represented by its Managing Director, agai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)