Search Results for "overlapping reliefs"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to MahaRERA Adjudicating Officer Order in Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Matter. Petition Filed Under Article 226 Seeking Quashing of Compensation Order on Ground of RERA Registration Exemption for Part Occupancy Certificate Phase.

The matter concerned a challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution to an order of the Adjudicating Officer, Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Redevelopment Contract Dispute. Non-Cooperating Members of Cooperative Housing Society Face Motion for Injunction and Mandatory Orders.

The plaintiff, a developer, filed suit for specific performance of a redevelopment contract against a cooperative housing society and some of its non-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Lease Dispute Over Overlapping Land Allotments. Order XII Rule 6 CPC Decree Set Aside as Lease Deeds Pertained to Different Survey Numbers and No Clear Admission of Liability Was Made.

The appeal arose from an order and judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court granting a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Under CGST Act Despite Previous Sanction for Overlapping Period. Second refund application for a specific month within a previously covered quarter is maintainable as the earlier sanction did not adjudicate the claim for that month.

The petitioner, Valmet Flow Control Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Interim Application in Partition Suit Over Alleged HUF Properties. Plaintiff Seeks Injunction and Appointment of Court Receiver Pending Suit, Claiming Undivided Share Despite 2001 Affidavit Acknowledging Properties as Self-Acquired.

The present order arises from an Interim Application filed by the plaintiff, Variinder @ Rajan, in Suit No. 343 of 2022 before the High Court of Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.

The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...