Search Results for "orange trees"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Case — Reduces Compensation by Applying Deduction for Development Charges. Court Enhances Multiplier for Irrigated Land from 8 to 10, Resulting in Modified Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Executive Engineer (acquiring body) against the judgment and order dated 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value of Irrigated Land Fixed at Rs.1,50,000 per Hectare. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Classification of land into dry/irrigated categories set aside; compensation for all 475 orange trees awarded.

The appellant, Liladhar s/o Pandurangi Pohane, owned agricultural land bearing survey No.10 admeasuring 7.35 hectares at village Pimpalgaon, Tahsil Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Market Value of Irrigable Land Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the K.P.M.P. irrigation project in Akola, Maharashtra. The claimant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Compensation of Fruit-Bearing Trees in Land Acquisition Case. The reference Court's dismissal of tree compensation was set aside as the valuer's evidence was unchallenged and the Supreme Court precedent was misapplied.

The appellant, Sau. Ushadevi Manikrao Baradkar, owned land in Gat No. 75 of Village Barad, Tq. Babhulgaon, District Yavatmal, which was acquired for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case for Lack of Evidence. Claimant's claim of irrigation and high yield not proved, compensation restored to LAO's award.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Akola, which enhanced compensation for land acqui...