Search Results for "ombudsman"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs Referral of Employee Grievance to Ombudsman for Redressal. Court Disposes of Writ Petition Without Adjudicating Merits, Directing Ombudsman Under Goa Government Employees (Redressal of Grievances Forum) to Decide Grievance Within Four Weeks.

The petitioner, Smt. Sushma D. Pinge, deployed as surplus Clinical Instructor at the Institute of Nursing Education, Bambolim, Goa, filed a writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insurance Ombudsman Award for Non-Compliance with Rule 17 and Ignoring Policy Terms. Ombudsman directed insurer to process claim without determining compensation or considering policy exclusions for medical expenses incurred in India.

The petitioner, Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 4 March 2024 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman for Mumbai. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as RBI Circulars Permit Cancellation After Three Months and Complaint Was Within Limitation.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ombudsman Report in Seniority Dispute — Seniority Determined by Date of Joining, Not Date of Recommendation by Public Service Commission.

The petitioners, including Maya M. Pednekar and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the report dated 16.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Insurance Ombudsman Award for Violation of Natural Justice — Employer Not Heard Before Award. Group Personal Accident Policy Claim Decided Without Notice to Employer, Award Set Aside and Remitted for Fresh Hearing.

The petitioner, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles. It had contracted a 'Group Personal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...