Search Results for "nuclear power plant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "nuclear power plant"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Retired Heavy Water Plant Employees Seeking Coverage Under Payment of Gratuity Act -- Central Government Employees Governed by CCS Rules Excluded from PG Act Provisions

11 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by retired employees of Heavy Water Plant, Department of Atomic Energy, Tuticorin, who sought coverage under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

3 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Favor of Respondent No.2 — No Arbitrariness Found in BARC's Decision to Award Horticultural Maintenance Contracts. The Court held that the evaluation of technical bids and the decision to award the contract were based on the tender conditions and were not arbitrary or mala fide.

17 Mar 2022

The Petitioner, M/s. Raut Enterprises, a sole partnership firm, challenged the decision of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) to award two horticult...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Mar 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Russian Company in Nuclear Power Project Tax Dispute — Lack of Fresh Material and Mechanical Approval of Sanction Invalidates Reopening Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Offshore Supply Contracts Not Taxable in India as Per Original Assessment; Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible.

1 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Atomstroyexport, a Russian joint stock company, challenged the jurisdiction of the Deputy Director of Income Tax (International Taxati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Relocation of BARC Nuclear Reactor Due to Tsunami and Fault Line Concerns. Court Holds No Credible Scientific Evidence of Imminent Danger to Nuclear Installation from Geological Fault Line or Tsunami.

28 Apr 2005

The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Citizens For A Just Society, a social organization founded by Dr. Usha Meh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)