Search Results for "misbranded cosmetics"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "misbranded cosmetics"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Lack of Sanction and Misapplication of Law. The court held that Mehandi Cones are cosmetics under the Act, but the complaint lacked valid sanction and failed to establish that the product was misbranded or adulterated.

22 Sep 2020

The petitioners, M/s Singh Mehandi Industries (a partnership firm) and its managing partner Manohar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

28 Sep 2016

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Respondents Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Due to Lack of Mandatory Enquiry Under Section 202 CrPC -- Misbranding Allegations Fail on Jurisdictional Grounds

26 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed criminal appeals arising from a complaint under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, alleging misbranding of a vaccine by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Indefinite Blacklisting Order for Misbranded Veterinary Medicine — Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Warning of Blacklisting and Appellant Was Not the Direct Supplier. The Court held that an indefinite blacklisting order without proper notice and without the appellant being a direct supplier is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

11 Dec 2020

The appellant, Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited, a licensed drug manufacturer, was blacklisted indefinitely by the State of Uttar Pradesh on 08.09.200...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution in Drugs & Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Violations and Non-Compliance with Statutory Mandates. Prosecution was invalidated because of inordinate delay in sample testing, failure to dispatch sample portion to manufacturer depriving retesting right, and improper cognizance by Special Judge without committal under Section 193 CrPC, under Section 27(d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its criminal appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Chemist's Licence for Substandard Drugs — Petitioner Furnished Manufacturer Details and Discontinued Sale, No Lack of Diligence Established Under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

20 Jan 2006

The petitioner, Kedarnath Saraf, was a licensed chemist and druggist under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court decline to Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Appellant for Alleged Violations Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

20 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against Appellant and its officials for alleged violations under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, rel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case for Lack of Sanction and Misjoinder of Parties. The court held that sanction under Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 is mandatory and its absence, along with misjoinder of parties and charges, warrants quashing of proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

19 May 2022

The petitioners, including individuals and companies involved in the manufacture and sale of drugs, filed petitions under Section 482 CrPC to quash cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Drug Manufacturers in Complaint Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act — Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. Complaint filed by Drugs Inspector without prior sanction of the Drug Controller under Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and without proper investigation, held to be invalid and liable to be quashed.

29 Oct 2018

The petitioners, AFD Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Angle French Drugs & Industries Ltd., and their directors, filed two criminal writ petitions under S...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)