Search Results for "market yard"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "market yard"

137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. yard Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Development Potential. Court Held That Acquired Land Had Building Potential and Was in a Developing Area, Warranting Higher Compensation.

13 Jun 2005

The case pertains to a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimants (owners of the acquired land) seeking enha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Compensation for Land Acquisition in Faridabad — Market Value Determined Based on Locational Advantage and Potentiality. The Court affirmed the High Court's use of cumulative increase method for time gap between notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding compensation for land acquired in Villages Ajronda, Talo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Cancelling Shop Allotment in APMC Yard — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Licence Cancelled Without Notice or Hearing, Held Arbitrary and Illegal Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mohammed Shah Nawaz, proprietor of Shah Nawaz and Brothers, had been carrying on business as a commission agent in the vegetable marke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Elections to Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Notification Requirement. Court holds that elections cannot be ordered until State Government issues notification under Section 13(1B) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, specifying number of members and reserved categories.

19 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shekhar Ramchandra Badade, claiming to be an agriculturist and member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Neera, filed a wri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Improper Reliance on Post-Notification Sale Exemplars. Market Value Determination Upheld as Sale Transactions After Preliminary Notification Cannot Be Basis, and Classification of Lands into Lots Not Justified When All Have Similar Advantages Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for developing a new grain market in Bhikhi, Punjab, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellan...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Conversion of Leave and License to Lease-cum-Sale for APMC Shop — Rule 12(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation of Allotment of Property in Market Yards) Rules, 2004 Mandates Conversion Upon Satisfaction of Conditions. The court quashed the resolution and notice directing vacation and directed the authorities to convert the agreement.

8 Dec 2023

The petitioner, M/s. P.C. Guddad & Sons, a partnership firm, is a licensed market functionary and trader operating in the Agricultural Produce Market ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Subsistence Allowance Dispute — Model Standing Orders Applicable to APMC. The court held that the definition of 'industrial or other establishments' under Section 2(ii) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, includes the act of presenting agricultural produce, making the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 applicable to the APMC.

30 Jan 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Nagpur, against the judgment of a Single Judge of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)