Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Comprehensive Measures to Tackle Uninsured Vehicles and Standardise Motor Insurance Policy Terms in Public Interest. Court Calls for Technology-Enabled Enforcement of Section 146 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Mandates Consumer Awareness Initiatives

The Supreme Court addressed two substantial issues arising in a civil appeal filed by an insurance company: the widespread non-compliance with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Insolvency Petition Under Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 — Debtor Fails to Prove Inability to Pay Debts as Maintenance Order Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Does Not Constitute a Debt Under Insolvency Act

The petitioner, Mehul Jagdish Trivedi, filed an insolvency petition under Section 14 of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, seeking to be decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Enforceable, Issues Directions on Minimum Turnover Clauses. The Court ruled that the Procurement Order 2012 has force of law and that minimum turnover clauses must be proportionate, directing effective implementation of the 25% procurement mandate.

The petitioner, a Micro Enterprise and its founder, challenged the legality of minimum turnover clauses in government tenders that prevented their par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Obligation of State Government to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases. Question of Whether Article 22(5) Mandates Separate Consideration by Government Before Referral to Advisory Board Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

The case involved writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Abdul Karim and Others against the State of West Bengal challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...