Search Results for "lump sum deduction"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim to Treat Compensation as Capital Receipt Under Income Tax Act. Lump sum payment received by managing agent for reduction in remuneration held to be revenue receipt as it was in lieu of future profits and not for loss of managing agency.

The assessee firm, M/s. Godrej & Company, was appointed managing agent of a limited company for thirty years from November 9, 1933, under an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Guarantee Money Paid to Non-Resident Cricket Boards for Matches Played in India. Income from matches held in India is deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attracting TDS under Section 194E.

The case concerns an appeal by PILCOM (PAK-INDO-LANKA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE), a committee formed by the cricket boards of Pakistan, India, and Sr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Payment for shrink-wrapped software held to be for copyright article, not transfer of copyright rights, thus not taxable as royalty.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)) against the common order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Jeevan Aadhar Policy Condition That Annuity Payable Only After Death of Proposer Under Section 80DD Income Tax Act. Court Holds That Policy Terms Align with Statutory Scheme and No Violation of Article 14.

The petitioner, Ravi Agrawal, a differently abled person, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court's Compensation Award in Industrial Dispute — Workman's Challenge for Reinstatement Dismissed. Lumpsum compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- upheld as adequate for 13 years of service, with no interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, Joseph Dahyabhai Solanki, was appointed as 'Operation Staff' with Blue Dart Express Limited on 8 June 1992 on probation for six months...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Lump Sum Compensation to Legal Heirs of Deceased Daily Wage Worker in Industrial Dispute. Compensation of Rs.1,20,000/- awarded in lieu of reinstatement and backwages for illegal termination due to non-availability of work.

The petitioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service, challenged the award dated 24.11.2021 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (LCA) ...