Search Results for "local trains"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "local trains"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railways Act Case, Overturning Tribunal's Denial Based on Self-Inflicted Injury Finding. Passenger's Fall from Train Door and Attempt to De-board Non-Halting Train Held Not to Constitute Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989, as Incident Occurred Due to Rush and Bonafide Mistake.

24 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from the Railway Claims Tribunal's order dated 31 January 2018 rejecting the appellant's claim for compensation for injuries sustaine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Accidental Fall as Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Mother of Deceased Granted Compensation as Sole Dependent Despite Absence of Ticket, as Tribunal Erred in Concluding Unauthorized Presence.

23 Mar 2021

The appellant, Smt. Rekha Dilip Sapkale, mother of the deceased Akash Dilip Sapkale, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Fall from Train as Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Recovery of Valid Monthly Season Ticket from Deceased's Body Establishes Bona Fide Passenger Status, Reversing Tribunal's Finding of Trespass.

9 Mar 2021

The appellants, parents of the deceased Milind Balaram Sakpal, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased Found to be Bonafide Passenger Based on Recovery of Tickets and Police Report.

4 May 2026

The appeal was filed by the original applicants, who are dependents of the deceased Mr. Arogyaraj Chetiyar, challenging an order of the Railway Claims...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a person found on railway tracks with severe injuries is an untoward incident, and the Railway failed to rebut the presumption of bona fide passenger status.

2 Jan 2023

The appellants, the widow and sons of the deceased Rangnath Dattarao Gaikwad, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

12 Apr 2022

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Deceased Passenger in Railways Act Case — Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Missing Ticket. The Court held that circumstantial evidence, including police inquest report and witness testimony, can prove passenger status under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Lata, wife of the deceased Chandrakant Thakkar, filed a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 after her husband fell from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Holds That 'Accidental Falling' Includes Falling Due to Dizziness or Fits, Not Only Bumping Against Objects. Tribunal Erred in Narrow Interpretation of 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

4 Jan 2010

The appellants, parents of the deceased Arvind Sanas, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

24 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)