Search Results for "kidney transplantation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "kidney transplantation"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Surgeon Challenging Orders Restricting Kidney Transplants Under Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994. Orders Passed Without Hearing Petitioner Violate Principles of Natural Justice and Are Quashed.

21 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Dr. Ajay Tejraj Oswal, a medical practitioner and surgeon, had been performing kidney transplantation surgeries since 1999 as a freela...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Kidney Donation by Cousin in Organ Transplantation Case — Authorization Committee's Rejection Set Aside. Donor and Recipient Are Cousins, Not 'Near Relatives' Under Section 2(i) of Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, But Donation Permitted on Grounds of Affection and Attachment.

27 Sep 2012

The case involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of a kidney donation proposal by the Author...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Mentally Challenged Person to Donate Kidney to Brother Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 — Natural Guardians Can Give Consent for Organ Donation by Mentally Incompetent Donor.

21 Dec 2017

The petitioners, Ganpatrao Pawar and his wife Suman, are parents of two sons: Amol (petitioner no. 3), who is mentally challenged and represented by h...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Kidney Transplant Petition Without Spousal NoC Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 — Spousal Consent Not Required for Organ Donation Where Donor is Competent and Willing.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioners, M.Maya Boopathi (first petitioner) and C.Sudarmani Nathan (second petitioner), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Organ Transplant Petitions Under Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 — Directs Authorization Committee to Reconsider Applications Without Insisting on Near Relative Donation. Court holds that the Authorization Committee must consider each case on its own merits and cannot reject applications solely because the donor is not a near relative, provided other statutory requirements are satisfied.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by individuals seeking organ transplants. The petitioners, including Master Siddhant Vikram Pal (a min...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Committee's Order Withholding Organ Donation Permission in Near-Relative Kidney Transplant Case. Court holds that a married woman's father is not her 'near relative' under Section 2(i) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, and his consent is not required for donation.

10 Jul 2020

The petitioners, Smt. Shailaja Madathil Valappil (recipient) and Smt. Sasidha M.P. (donor), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Contributory Negligence Determined Based on Police Records and Evidence. Compensation Enhanced for Permanent Disability and Loss of Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

4 Nov 2020

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 09.01.2015 at about 8.30 p.m. when the claimant, Akash, was riding a motorcycle near Sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)