Search Results for "katha transfer"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Khata Transfer in Property Dispute — BBMP Endorsement Quashed for Disregarding Registered Release Deed. Release Deed Must Be Given Effect Under Section 149 of BBMP Act; Writ of Mandamus Issued to Bring Khata in Conformity.

The petitioner, Sharmada B K, a practicing dentist, along with her parents, purchased site No.31 carved out of Sy.No.123 and 131 (old No.71) in Kathri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Endorsement Denying Khata Change Due to Pending Civil Suit. Property Tax Khata Transfer Cannot Be Denied Solely on Ground of Civil Suit Pendency Without Adjudication of Title.

The petitioners, Smt. Shanthamma and others, are legal heirs of late H.A. Veerabhadrappa. They filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Appeals on Validity of Gift Deed and Revocation Deed in Joint Family Property. The Appeals Concern Whether a Gift Deed by a Karta Is Void against Coparceners and Whether a Revocation Deed Is Illegal.

The litigation arose from two suits concerning a house property bearing Municipal No. 8-11-181/800 in Raichur, claimed as joint family property of whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Dismissal of Declaration Suit. Suit Filed by Brother of Deceased Religious Head for Declaration of Ownership of Property Allotted in 1952, Dismissed by Trial Court.

This Regular First Appeal and cross-objections arise from the judgment and decree dated 9 September 2005 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010662922011_1

The judgment is a common order in House Rent Revision Petition Nos. 136/2011 and 115/2011, and Regular First Appeal No. 160/2021. The appellant, Smt. ...