Search Results for "joint pursis"

118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award for Lack of Valid Reference Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Petitioner's Signature Obtained Without Proper Procedure Renders Award Void.

The petitioner, Madhukar Baburao Shete, a senior citizen with 95% physical disability, challenged an award passed by the Lok Adalat in Regular Civil S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Suit Against Unserved Defendant Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons on Defendant No.1(c) Despite Court Directions and Lapse of Over Three Years Justifies Dismissal; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Invoking Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner/plaintiff filed R.A.D. Suit No.600 of 2005 before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of tenancy/deemed tenancy in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Striking Out of Defence in Suit for Specific Performance. Defence of Defendant No.2 Restored as Trial Court's Discretion to Strike Out Defence Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC Requires Willful Disobedience of Injunction Order.

The Petitioner, Sanjay Thakkar, was Defendant No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.144 of 2016 filed by Respondent No.1, Bhojja Shantu Shetty, for enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Specific Performance Suit — Res Judicata Not Applicable to Lok Adalat Award. Court holds that a compromise decree passed by Lok Adalat does not bar a subsequent suit for specific performance of the same agreement.

The revision application was filed by the petitioner (Ajitpalsingh Khalsa) against the order dated 21/11/2015 passed by the Jt. Civil Judge (SD) Amrav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection in Murder Conviction Appeals — Joint Trial of Two Sessions Cases Upheld. No Prejudice Found in Common Judgment Under Section 374(2) CrPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment dated 30.03.2016 in Sessions Trial Nos. 144/2012 and 233/2014. The appellants we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Pre-emption Suit — Letter Held to Constitute Waiver of Right of Pre-emption. Agreement among co-sharers to give preference in sale was waived by plaintiff's letter consenting to sale to stranger.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1994 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 2/1993 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compromise Order in Municipal Council Service Dispute — President Exceeded Powers Under Maharashtra Municipalities Act. President's Compromise Without Council Resolution and Without Following Statutory Rules Is Invalid and Not Binding on the Council.

The petitioner, Municipal Council Karmala, challenged an order dated 27.3.1997 passed by the Industrial Court, Solapur, which disposed of a complaint ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...