Search Results for "interest waiver"

650 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 650 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Interest Under Section 234C of Income Tax Act Due to COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Advance Tax Estimation. The court held that the Chief Commissioner must reconsider the waiver application, considering the pandemic as a valid ground for failure to estimate advance tax.

The petitioner, Grasim Industries Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30th March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Admission of Liability in Written Statement Constitutes Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit for Recovery of Money Based on Supply of Goods Held Not Time-Barred Due to Defendant's Admission.

The case involves a suit for recovery of money filed by M/s. Jindal Steels, a partnership firm (plaintiff), against Trident Architectural Aluminium Pr...