downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
61 result(s) found
The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...
The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...
The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by M/s MFAR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Mangalore Force, challenging the interpretation of Sec...
The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...
A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...
The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) again...
The State of Karnataka, through the Department of Finance, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challeng...
The assessee, M/s M K Agro Tech (P) Ltd, a private limited company engaged in extraction and sale of refined sunflower oil from sunflower oil cake usi...
The appeals arose from reassessment orders passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, denying input tax credit to tea and coffee plantation...
