Search Results for "innocent owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "innocent owner"

207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Maritime Claim — Charterer's Claim for Sub-Charterer's Expenses Not a Maritime Lien. The court held that a claim for damages arising from a sub-charterer's expenses due to arrest of the chartered vessel by a third party does not constitute a maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and the vessel cannot be arrested for such a claim.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Applicant, the owner of the vessel M.V. AODABAO (Defendant No. 1), seeking to vacate the order of ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Orders Under Section 18(1) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 for Exceeding Statutory Scope and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the orders dated 21st August 2004 were beyond the powers conferred under Section 18(1) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and quashed them.

4 May 2005

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by Dhansingh Gopal Chauhan and Shivaji Dattu Pawar against the State of Maharashtra, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Bunkers Arrest Case. Bunkers on board a ship can be arrested and sold separately under admiralty jurisdiction as they are not part of the ship.

5 May 2017

The appellant, Mansel Limited, a Bermuda company engaged in chartering vessels, filed an admiralty suit seeking arrest of bunkers on board the vessel ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pay-and-Recover Direction Against Insurer for Dishonoured Cheque Premium — Insurer Must Pay Third-Party Claimants First Then Recover from Owner. The court held that under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer is liable to third parties even if the premium cheque was dishonoured, and the direction to pay first and recover from the owner is valid.

4 Dec 2017

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and award dated 7th November 2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola in...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Ownership Dispute — Seller Not Liable for Accidents After Delivery. Transfer of Ownership Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Requires Registration by Transferee; Seller's Failure to Report Transfer to Registering Authority Does Not Make Him Owner After Delivery.

13 Feb 2026

The appellant, V.Selvam, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.50 of 2022 before the Additional District Court, Dharmapuri. He sought a declaration that he was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

6 May 2022

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Plaintiff to Bear Costs of Discharge and Storage of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit. The court held that a party who secures an order of arrest of cargo cannot insist that the shipowner bear the costs of discharging and storing the cargo, as the shipowner is not a party to the arrest and the cargo is in custodia legis.

27 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the owner of the vessel m.v. Ocean 39 (the ship interests) seeking directions against the plaintiff, Cup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction in Share Dispute Case. Court Restrains Transfer of Shares Allegedly Misappropriated Pending Suit, Holding That a Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Breach of Trust Was Made Out.

12 Jun 2014

The appellant, Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit alleging that respondent No.1, Renudevi Choudhary, and respondent No.2, Ekta Choudhary (her ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)