Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Rules and Absence of Injury Opinion. Conviction Set Aside as Analyst Report (Exh.48) Did Not State That the 'Rava' Sample Was Injurious to Health, and Non-Compliance with Rules 14, 16, and 22 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Vitiated the Prosecution Case.
27 Feb 2019The case arose out of a food adulteration prosecution initiated by the Food Inspector against the applicants, who operated a kirana shop at Malkapur. ...
