Search Results for "infringement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "infringement"

524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 524 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV Letters Patent to Combine Passing Off with Infringement Cause of Action to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The court held that once jurisdiction over infringement is established, leave to combine passing off claim should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

18 Jan 2014

The Plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and Another, filed a suit for infringement of their registered trademarks, including 'UltraTech Cement', and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear imitation of the Plaintiff's registered designs, and the Plaintiff made out a strong prima facie case for protection.

27 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Whirlpool of India Ltd., a subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, filed a suit for design infringement against Videocon Industries Ltd. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Release of Marathi Film 'Mukkam Post' in Copyright Infringement Suit. Court finds prima facie case of substantial similarity between plaintiff's script and defendants' film, and balance of convenience in favour of plaintiff.

24 Oct 2025

The plaintiff, Everest Entertainment LLP, filed a suit for copyright infringement against the defendants, including Mahesh Vaman Manjrekar, Great Mara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Combine Infringement and Passing Off Causes of Action in UltraTech Trade Marks Case. The court held that under Clause 14 of the Letters Patent, a plaintiff can combine infringement and passing off claims when both arise from the same set of facts and the court has jurisdiction over the infringement claim under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2015

The plaintiffs, Ultratech Cement Ltd. and its parent company, filed a suit alleging infringement of their registered trade marks containing the word '...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case Over Liquor Labels — No Substantial Similarity Found Between 'Prince Santra' and Defendant's Label. The court held that the labels were not substantially similar and that the plaintiffs failed to prove infringement under the Copyright Act, 1957.

21 Sep 2005

The case involves an appeal by the original defendants, The Brihan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate, against a judgment of the Additional District Judge, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

22 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)