Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "infrastructure fee"
281 result(s) found
Found 281 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants in Maharashtra Rent Control Act Case for Non-Payment of Rent and Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact on default and unauthorized subletting under Sections 15, 16, 17 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, affirmed by High Court, not interfered with by Supreme Court.
1 Jan 2026The batch of appeals arose from eviction decrees passed against tenants under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The appellants, tenants of indus...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 403
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.
1 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...
- 407
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.
1 Jul 2024The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...
- 644
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.
1 Jul 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...
- 314
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Fee Regulation Act in Challenge by Parents' Association — School Fee Fixation Must Comply with Statutory Framework Under Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2013. The court held that the Act and Rules are constitutionally valid and directed the Fee Regulatory Committee to reconsider the fee structure.
7 Aug 2018The petitioners, Khed Taluka Vidyarthi Palak Sangh (a society registered under the Maharashtra Societies Registration Act, 1860) and Kiran Kamlakar Kh...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.
18 Jul 2017The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).
28 Feb 2014The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Stay on Airport Levy Imposed on Catering Companies Under Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 — Prima Facie Case Made Out That Levy May Be Ultra Vires Section 22A. Court Restrains Respondent from Recovering 10% Levy on Gross Turnover and from Revoking Licences Pending Final Hearing.
5 Jan 2010The petitioners, Taj Sats Air Catering Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hig...
- 34
